Fruity imp vs Stokes Brown Sauce 20 G (pack of )
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fruity imp | Stokes Brown Sauce 20 G (pac... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 137 kcal | 194 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 25.6 g | 37.5 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 1.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Orange | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fruity imp has 29% fewer calories (137 kcal vs 194 kcal).
- Fruity imp has no fat, while Stokes Brown Sauce 20 G (pack of ) has 0.3 g.
- Fruity imp has 32% less sugar (25.6 g vs 37.5 g).
- Stokes Brown Sauce 20 G (pack of ) has 33% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.2 g).
- Stokes Brown Sauce 20 G (pack of ) has 36% more protein (1.4 g vs 0.9 g).
- Stokes Brown Sauce 20 G (pack of ) is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Fruity imp lists: Gluten, Orange.
Ingredients
Fruity imp
fruit (tomatoes, dates, oranges, tamarind), glucose-fructose syrup, barley malt vinegar, sugar, spirit vinegar, mango chutney (sugar, mango, vinegar, salt, garlic, spices), modified corn flour, molasses, rye flour, salt, spices, flavourings,
Stokes Brown Sauce 20 G (pack of )
vinaigre de malte, sucre de canne non raffiné, purée de tomate, purée de datte, mollasse, farine de mais coriandre, gingembre, clou de girofle, cannelle, poivre, sel de mer, acide sorbique
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fruity imp or Stokes Brown Sauce 20 G (pack of )?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fruity imp has fewer calories: 137 kcal versus 194 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fruity imp has less sugar: 25.6 g versus 37.5 g per 100 g.