Comparison

Fruity imp vs Delikatess Sauce zu Braten

Overall, Delikatess Sauce zu Braten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFruity impDelikatess Sauce zu Braten
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 137 kcal 26 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.9 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.5 g
Sugars 25.6 g 0.6 g
Salt 1.2 g 1.4 g
Fiber — 0.4 g
Protein 0.9 g 0.7 g
Additives02
AllergensGluten, OrangeGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Delikatess Sauce zu Braten has 81% fewer calories (26 kcal vs 137 kcal).
  • Fruity imp has no fat, while Delikatess Sauce zu Braten has 0.9 g.
  • Fruity imp has no saturated fat, while Delikatess Sauce zu Braten has 0.5 g.
  • Delikatess Sauce zu Braten has 98% less sugar (0.6 g vs 25.6 g).
  • Delikatess Sauce zu Braten has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Fruity imp lists: Orange.

Ingredients

Fruity imp

fruit (tomatoes, dates, oranges, tamarind), glucose-fructose syrup, barley malt vinegar, sugar, spirit vinegar, mango chutney (sugar, mango, vinegar, salt, garlic, spices), modified corn flour, molasses, rye flour, salt, spices, flavourings,

Delikatess Sauce zu Braten

Jodsalz (Salz, kaliumjodat), Reismehl, Stärke, Palmfett, Aromen (mit Gerste), Weizenmehl, Hefeextrakt, Karamellzucker, Zucker, 3,5% tomatenpulver, Verdickungsmittel Guarkernmehl, Gewürze, 2,4 % Zwiebeln, Maltodextrin, Säuerungsmittel Zitronensäure.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Fruity imp or Delikatess Sauce zu Braten?

Overall, Delikatess Sauce zu Braten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Delikatess Sauce zu Braten has fewer calories: 26 kcal versus 137 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Delikatess Sauce zu Braten has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 25.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons