Fruit Intense Pomme Myrtille Sauvage vs Rhubarbe morceaux fondants
Overall, Fruit Intense Pomme Myrtille Sauvage has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Fruit Intense Pomme Myrtille Sauvage
Rhubarbe morceaux fondants
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fruit Intense Pomme Myrtille... | Rhubarbe morceaux fondants |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 64 kcal | 89 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 12 g | 19 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.2 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fruit Intense Pomme Myrtille Sauvage has 28% fewer calories (64 kcal vs 89 kcal).
- Rhubarbe morceaux fondants has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Fruit Intense Pomme Myrtille Sauvage has 37% less sugar (12 g vs 19 g).
- Fruit Intense Pomme Myrtille Sauvage has the better Nutri-Score.
- Rhubarbe morceaux fondants is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Fruit Intense Pomme Myrtille Sauvage
Pomme origine France (purée, purée concentrée), 78,6 %, myrtille sauvage 20,0 %, fibres de citrons, épaississant : pectine, arôme naturel, jus de citron concentré, vitamine C.
Rhubarbe morceaux fondants
Rhubarbe 80%, sucre, antioxydant : acide ascorbique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fruit Intense Pomme Myrtille Sauvage or Rhubarbe morceaux fondants?
Overall, Fruit Intense Pomme Myrtille Sauvage has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fruit Intense Pomme Myrtille Sauvage has fewer calories: 64 kcal versus 89 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fruit Intense Pomme Myrtille Sauvage has less sugar: 12 g versus 19 g per 100 g.