Franzela cu graham vs Pâine Tapas Clasică
Overall, Franzela cu graham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Franzela cu graham | Pâine Tapas Clasică |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 243 kcal | 276 kcal |
| Fat | 1.6 g | 5.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 4.5 g | 5 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 6 g | — |
| Protein | 9.1 g | 8.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Franzela cu graham has 12% fewer calories (243 kcal vs 276 kcal).
- Franzela cu graham has 72% less fat (1.6 g vs 5.8 g).
- Franzela cu graham has 10% less sugar (4.5 g vs 5 g).
- Franzela cu graham has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pâine Tapas Clasică lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Franzela cu graham
Făină albă de grâu, apă, 21% făină dietetică graham de grâu, făină neagră de grâu, drojdie, sare iodată, maia deshidratată din făină de grâu, făină de malţ din grâu. Poate conţine urme de: ouă, arahide, soia, lapte, fructe cu coajă lemnoasă, semințe de susan.
Pâine Tapas Clasică
Făină de grâu 56 %, apă, ulei de rapiţă, drojdie, zahăr, otet din cidru de mere, fulgi de cartofi, sare, proteine de grâu, corector de aciditate (acetat de sodiu), agenţi de afânare (difosfati, carbonati de sodiu), amidon de porumb.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Franzela cu graham or Pâine Tapas Clasică?
Overall, Franzela cu graham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Franzela cu graham has fewer calories: 243 kcal versus 276 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Franzela cu graham has less sugar: 4.5 g versus 5 g per 100 g.