Franzela cu graham vs Munteneasca
Overall, Franzela cu graham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Franzela cu graham | Munteneasca |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 243 kcal | 309 kcal |
| Fat | 1.6 g | 9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 1.5 g |
| Sugars | 4.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 6 g | 5 g |
| Protein | 9.1 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Franzela cu graham has 21% fewer calories (243 kcal vs 309 kcal).
- Franzela cu graham has 82% less fat (1.6 g vs 9 g).
- Franzela cu graham has 73% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1.5 g).
- Munteneasca has 91% less sugar (0.4 g vs 4.5 g).
- Franzela cu graham has 29% less salt (1 g vs 1.4 g).
- Franzela cu graham has 17% more fiber (6 g vs 5 g).
- Franzela cu graham has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Franzela cu graham
Făină albă de grâu, apă, 21% făină dietetică graham de grâu, făină neagră de grâu, drojdie, sare iodată, maia deshidratată din făină de grâu, făină de malţ din grâu. Poate conţine urme de: ouă, arahide, soia, lapte, fructe cu coajă lemnoasă, semințe de susan.
Munteneasca
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Franzela cu graham or Munteneasca?
Overall, Franzela cu graham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Franzela cu graham has fewer calories: 243 kcal versus 309 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Munteneasca has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.