Fol Epi vs Leerdammer léger
Overall, Leerdammer léger has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fol Epi | Leerdammer léger |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 352 kcal | 262 kcal |
| Fat | 28 g | 16 g |
| Saturated fat | 19 g | 10.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 29.5 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Leerdammer léger has 26% fewer calories (262 kcal vs 352 kcal).
- Leerdammer léger has 43% less fat (16 g vs 28 g).
- Leerdammer léger has 45% less saturated fat (10.5 g vs 19 g).
- Leerdammer léger has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Leerdammer léger has 15% more protein (29.5 g vs 25 g).
- Leerdammer léger is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Fol Epi
milk (france origin), salt, ferments, crust colours: plain caramel, beta-carotene,
Leerdammer léger
Lait pasteurisé, sel, ferments lactiques, enzyme coagulante microbienne,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fol Epi or Leerdammer léger?
Overall, Leerdammer léger has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Leerdammer léger has fewer calories: 262 kcal versus 352 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Leerdammer léger has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.