Emmental vs Leerdammer léger
Overall, Leerdammer léger has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Emmental | Leerdammer léger |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 386 kcal | 262 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 16 g |
| Saturated fat | 19 g | 10.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 29 g | 29.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Leerdammer léger has 32% fewer calories (262 kcal vs 386 kcal).
- Leerdammer léger has 47% less fat (16 g vs 30 g).
- Leerdammer léger has 45% less saturated fat (10.5 g vs 19 g).
- Emmental has 27% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.5 g).
Ingredients
Emmental
pasteurized cow's milk, salt, lactic ferments, microbial coagulant, milk of eu origin
Leerdammer léger
Lait pasteurisé, sel, ferments lactiques, enzyme coagulante microbienne,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Emmental or Leerdammer léger?
Overall, Leerdammer léger has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Leerdammer léger has fewer calories: 262 kcal versus 386 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Emmental has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.