Flönz vs Kabanosy drobiowe
Overall, Kabanosy drobiowe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Flönz | Kabanosy drobiowe |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 371 kcal | 271 kcal |
| Fat | 35 g | 17 g |
| Saturated fat | 12.5 g | 5.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 4.8 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kabanosy drobiowe has 27% fewer calories (271 kcal vs 371 kcal).
- Kabanosy drobiowe has 51% less fat (17 g vs 35 g).
- Kabanosy drobiowe has 55% less saturated fat (5.6 g vs 12.5 g).
- Flönz has 63% less sugar (0.3 g vs 0.8 g).
- Kabanosy drobiowe has 37% less salt (1.3 g vs 2 g).
- Kabanosy drobiowe has 48% more protein (25 g vs 13 g).
- Kabanosy drobiowe has the better Nutri-Score.
- Flönz is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Flönz
72% Schweinefleisch, 13% Speck, Schweineblut, 3% Schweineschwarten, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumjodat), Gewürze, Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit, Naturdarm Rind, Rauch.
Kabanosy drobiowe
Mięso z kurczaka, mięso z indyka, skrobia, sól, substancja żelująca: alginian sodu; błonnik pszenny bezglutenowy, przyprawy, aromaty, cukier, acerola w proszku.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Flönz or Kabanosy drobiowe?
Overall, Kabanosy drobiowe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kabanosy drobiowe has fewer calories: 271 kcal versus 371 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Flönz has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.