Comparison
Flan coco vs Flan coco
Overall, Flan coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Flan coco | Flan coco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 244 kcal | 209 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 7.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.7 g | 7.6 g |
| Sugars | 20 g | 18 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 3.8 g | 3.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Flan coco has 14% fewer calories (209 kcal vs 244 kcal).
- Flan coco has 37% less fat (7.6 g vs 12 g).
- Flan coco has 13% less saturated fat (7.6 g vs 8.7 g).
- Flan coco has 10% less sugar (18 g vs 20 g).
- Flan coco has 18% more protein (3.8 g vs 3.1 g).
Ingredients
Flan coco
Not available.
Flan coco
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Flan coco or Flan coco?
Overall, Flan coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Flan coco has fewer calories: 209 kcal versus 244 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Flan coco has less sugar: 18 g versus 20 g per 100 g.