Comparison
Part flan coco vs Flan coco
Overall, Part flan coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Part flan coco | Flan coco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 190 kcal | 244 kcal |
| Fat | 8.3 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.7 g | 8.7 g |
| Sugars | 17 g | 20 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 3.4 g | 3.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Part flan coco has 22% fewer calories (190 kcal vs 244 kcal).
- Part flan coco has 31% less fat (8.3 g vs 12 g).
- Part flan coco has 34% less saturated fat (5.7 g vs 8.7 g).
- Part flan coco has 15% less sugar (17 g vs 20 g).
- Flan coco has 11% more protein (3.8 g vs 3.4 g).
Ingredients
Part flan coco
Not available.
Flan coco
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Part flan coco or Flan coco?
Overall, Part flan coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Part flan coco has fewer calories: 190 kcal versus 244 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Part flan coco has less sugar: 17 g versus 20 g per 100 g.