Flan caramelo vs Yoeggs gusto cocco
Overall, Yoeggs gusto cocco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Flan caramelo | Yoeggs gusto cocco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 93 kcal | 54 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 17 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 2 | 4 |
| Allergens | Milk, Pork | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Yoeggs gusto cocco has 42% fewer calories (54 kcal vs 93 kcal).
- Yoeggs gusto cocco has 63% less fat (0.3 g vs 0.8 g).
- Yoeggs gusto cocco has 74% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Yoeggs gusto cocco has 99% less sugar (0.2 g vs 17 g).
- Flan caramelo has 84% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Yoeggs gusto cocco has 76% more protein (10 g vs 2.4 g).
- Yoeggs gusto cocco has the better Nutri-Score.
- Flan caramelo is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Flan caramelo lists: Milk, Pork.
Ingredients
Flan caramelo
pork (eu origin), salt, lactose dextrose, sugar, pepper, garlic, antioxygen: preservative sodium erythorbate: potassium nitrate, ferments (milk), 130 g pork used for 100 g of finished product,
Yoeggs gusto cocco
Albume, Dolcificante: Eritritolo - Glicosidi Steviolici, Correttore di Acidità: Acido Citrico, Aromi Naturali: Yogurt-Cocco, Addensante: Agar Agar - Radice di Konjac.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Flan caramelo or Yoeggs gusto cocco?
Overall, Yoeggs gusto cocco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Yoeggs gusto cocco has fewer calories: 54 kcal versus 93 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Yoeggs gusto cocco has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 17 g per 100 g.