Flan caramelo vs Löffelglück - Kirschgrütze
Overall, Flan caramelo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Flan caramelo | Löffelglück - Kirschgrütze |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 93 kcal | 102 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 17 g | 21 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 1 g |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk, Pork | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Löffelglück - Kirschgrütze has 63% less fat (0.3 g vs 0.8 g).
- Löffelglück - Kirschgrütze has 80% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Flan caramelo has 19% less sugar (17 g vs 21 g).
- Flan caramelo has 79% more protein (2.4 g vs 0.5 g).
- Flan caramelo is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Flan caramelo lists: Milk, Pork.
Ingredients
Flan caramelo
pork (eu origin), salt, lactose dextrose, sugar, pepper, garlic, antioxygen: preservative sodium erythorbate: potassium nitrate, ferments (milk), 130 g pork used for 100 g of finished product,
Löffelglück - Kirschgrütze
Sauerkirschen, Wasser, Zucker, modifizierte Stärke (Mais), Maisstärke, Verdickungsmittel (Xanthan, Johannisbrotkernmehl)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Flan caramelo or Löffelglück - Kirschgrütze?
Overall, Flan caramelo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Flan caramelo has fewer calories: 93 kcal versus 102 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Flan caramelo has less sugar: 17 g versus 21 g per 100 g.