Comparison

Dessert végétal caramel vs Yoeggs gusto cocco

Overall, Yoeggs gusto cocco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDessert végétal caramelYoeggs gusto cocco
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 79 kcal 54 kcal
Fat 1.9 g 0.3 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.1 g
Sugars 11.7 g 0.2 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.7 g
Protein 0.5 g 10 g
Additives44
AllergensNutsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Yoeggs gusto cocco has 32% fewer calories (54 kcal vs 79 kcal).
  • Yoeggs gusto cocco has 84% less fat (0.3 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Yoeggs gusto cocco has 98% less sugar (0.2 g vs 11.7 g).
  • Dessert végétal caramel has 76% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Yoeggs gusto cocco has 95% more protein (10 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Yoeggs gusto cocco has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Dessert végétal caramel lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Dessert végétal caramel

76% lait d'_amande_ (eau, 3.4% purée d'_amande_), sucre, 4,5% caramel (sucre, eau), amidons de manioc et de maïs, farine de riz, arôme naturel de caramel, arôme naturel, sirop de sucre caramélisé, épaississants: carraghénanes, agar-agar ; sel, antioxydant: extrait riche en tocophérols ; correcteur d'acidité: phosphates de calcium.

Yoeggs gusto cocco

Albume, Dolcificante: Eritritolo - Glicosidi Steviolici, Correttore di Acidità: Acido Citrico, Aromi Naturali: Yogurt-Cocco, Addensante: Agar Agar - Radice di Konjac.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Dessert végétal caramel or Yoeggs gusto cocco?

Overall, Yoeggs gusto cocco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Yoeggs gusto cocco has fewer calories: 54 kcal versus 79 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Yoeggs gusto cocco has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 11.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons