Comparison

Filetti di alici in olio di oliva vs Filetes de Anchoa

Overall, Filetti di alici in olio di oliva has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFiletti di alici in olio di...Filetes de Anchoa
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 222 kcal 208 kcal
Fat 11.8 g 12 g
Saturated fat 2.3 g 3.1 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 12.6 g 14 g
Fiber 4.2 g —
Protein 28.9 g 25 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filetti di alici in olio di oliva has 26% less saturated fat (2.3 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Filetti di alici in olio di oliva has 10% less salt (12.6 g vs 14 g).
  • Filetti di alici in olio di oliva has 13% more protein (28.9 g vs 25 g).

Ingredients

Filetti di alici in olio di oliva

ACCIUGHE (Engraulis encrasicholus), olio di oliva, sale, chiodo di garofano.

Filetes de Anchoa

Anchoas (Engraulis encrasicolus) (pescado), aceite de oliva y sal. Semiconserva Mantenasse entre 3°Cy 10 PAnchova (Engraulis encrasicolus) (peixe), azeite e sal. Valor Energético/Energia Grasas/Lípidos de las cuales/dos quais: - Saturadas/Saturados ames de servir nsumir antes P Semi-Conservas manter entre 3 °C e 10 do frigorífico 30 minutos antes de servir. Apó cobrir com oleo e consumir no prazo de 5 del frigo abierto Por 100 g de peso neto 1773 kJ 419 kcal 38 g 800 500 220 பரி பர் 59q Peso Neto 42 Peso Escorric MERCADONA

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filetti di alici in olio di oliva or Filetes de Anchoa?

Overall, Filetti di alici in olio di oliva has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filetes de Anchoa has fewer calories: 208 kcal versus 222 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filetti di alici in olio di oliva has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons