Cantabrico pasta di acciughe vs Filetes de Anchoa
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cantabrico pasta di acciughe | Filetes de Anchoa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 178 kcal | 208 kcal |
| Fat | 11.5 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.3 g | 3.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 16.6 g | 14 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | — |
| Protein | 18.5 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cantabrico pasta di acciughe has 14% fewer calories (178 kcal vs 208 kcal).
- Cantabrico pasta di acciughe has 26% less saturated fat (2.3 g vs 3.1 g).
- Filetes de Anchoa has 16% less salt (14 g vs 16.6 g).
- Filetes de Anchoa has 26% more protein (25 g vs 18.5 g).
Ingredients
Cantabrico pasta di acciughe
ACCIUGHE (87,5%), olio di oliva, sale, chiodi di garofano
Filetes de Anchoa
Anchoas (Engraulis encrasicolus) (pescado), aceite de oliva y sal. Semiconserva Mantenasse entre 3°Cy 10 PAnchova (Engraulis encrasicolus) (peixe), azeite e sal. Valor Energético/Energia Grasas/Lípidos de las cuales/dos quais: - Saturadas/Saturados ames de servir nsumir antes P Semi-Conservas manter entre 3 °C e 10 do frigorífico 30 minutos antes de servir. Apó cobrir com oleo e consumir no prazo de 5 del frigo abierto Por 100 g de peso neto 1773 kJ 419 kcal 38 g 800 500 220 பரி பர் 59q Peso Neto 42 Peso Escorric MERCADONA
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cantabrico pasta di acciughe or Filetes de Anchoa?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cantabrico pasta di acciughe has fewer calories: 178 kcal versus 208 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cantabrico pasta di acciughe has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.