Comparison

Filets de maquereaux nature vs Filets de Maquereaux au Vin Blanc

Overall, Filets de maquereaux nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilets de maquereaux natureFilets de Maquereaux au Vin...
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 206 kcal 160 kcal
Fat 14 g 12 g
Saturated fat 3.6 g 2.8 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.9 g 1.1 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 20 g 12 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filets de Maquereaux au Vin Blanc has 22% fewer calories (160 kcal vs 206 kcal).
  • Filets de Maquereaux au Vin Blanc has 14% less fat (12 g vs 14 g).
  • Filets de Maquereaux au Vin Blanc has 22% less saturated fat (2.8 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Filets de maquereaux nature has no sugar, while Filets de Maquereaux au Vin Blanc has 0.5 g.
  • Filets de maquereaux nature has 40% more protein (20 g vs 12 g).
  • Filets de maquereaux nature has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Filets de maquereaux nature is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Filets de maquereaux nature

Filets de maquereaux, eau, sel

Filets de Maquereaux au Vin Blanc

Filets de _maquereaux_ (60%), eau, légumes en proportion variable (10%) (cornichon, carotte, poivron rouge, oignon), vinaigre de vin blanc, vinaigre d'alcool, vin blanc (1,8%), sel, persil (0,5%), arômes naturels.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filets de maquereaux nature or Filets de Maquereaux au Vin Blanc?

Overall, Filets de maquereaux nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filets de Maquereaux au Vin Blanc has fewer calories: 160 kcal versus 206 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filets de maquereaux nature has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons