Comparison

Filets de hareng fumes vs Filets de harengs fumés doux

Overall, Filets de hareng fumes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilets de hareng fumesFilets de harengs fumés doux
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 236 kcal 175 kcal
Fat 17 g 12 g
Saturated fat 3.9 g 3.2 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.3 g 4 g
Fiber 0.3 g 0.5 g
Protein 19 g 17 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filets de harengs fumés doux has 26% fewer calories (175 kcal vs 236 kcal).
  • Filets de harengs fumés doux has 29% less fat (12 g vs 17 g).
  • Filets de harengs fumés doux has 18% less saturated fat (3.2 g vs 3.9 g).
  • Filets de hareng fumes has no sugar, while Filets de harengs fumés doux has 0.5 g.
  • Filets de hareng fumes has 68% less salt (1.3 g vs 4 g).
  • Filets de hareng fumes has 11% more protein (19 g vs 17 g).
  • Filets de hareng fumes has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Filets de hareng fumes

Filets de hareng fumés (clupea harengus) 75.8 %, huile de tournesol 22.2 %, poivre noir 1,1 %, sel 0,9 %.

Filets de harengs fumés doux

Hareng (Clupea harengus) (poisson) 96%, sel 4%.Pêchés en Atlantique Nord-Est (Mer de Norvège, Mer du Nord, Islande et Féroé, Ouest Ecosse, Manche et Mers Celtiques) avec : sennes, chaluts, filets tournants et filets soulevés.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filets de hareng fumes or Filets de harengs fumés doux?

Overall, Filets de hareng fumes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filets de harengs fumés doux has fewer calories: 175 kcal versus 236 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filets de hareng fumes has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons