Comparison

Filet de poulet blanc vs Emincés de filets de poulet rôtis

Overall, Filet de poulet blanc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilet de poulet blancEmincés de filets de poulet...
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 106 kcal 119 kcal
Fat 1.5 g 2.1 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.6 g
Sugars 0 g 1.2 g
Salt 0.1 g 1.4 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 23 g 23 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filet de poulet blanc has 11% fewer calories (106 kcal vs 119 kcal).
  • Filet de poulet blanc has 29% less fat (1.5 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Filet de poulet blanc has no saturated fat, while Emincés de filets de poulet rôtis has 0.6 g.
  • Filet de poulet blanc has no sugar, while Emincés de filets de poulet rôtis has 1.2 g.
  • Filet de poulet blanc has 92% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Filet de poulet blanc is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Emincés de filets de poulet rôtis lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Filet de poulet blanc

Filets de poulet.

Emincés de filets de poulet rôtis

Filet de poulet, eau, amidon modifié, vinaigre, sel, arômes, fibre de blé (sans gluten), ferments. Traces éventuelles de lait, d'oeuf et d'autres céréales contenant du gluten. Viande origine France. 104g de viande mis en œuvre pour 100g de produit fini. *Alimentation 100% végétaux, minéraux et vitamines.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filet de poulet blanc or Emincés de filets de poulet rôtis?

Overall, Filet de poulet blanc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filet de poulet blanc has fewer calories: 106 kcal versus 119 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filet de poulet blanc has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons