Filet de carrelet MSC vs Filets de carrelets
Overall, Filet de carrelet MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de carrelet MSC | Filets de carrelets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 63 kcal | 89 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 1.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 14.4 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de carrelet MSC has 29% fewer calories (63 kcal vs 89 kcal).
- Filet de carrelet MSC has 68% less fat (0.6 g vs 1.9 g).
- Filets de carrelets has 20% more protein (18 g vs 14.4 g).
Ingredients
Filet de carrelet MSC
Not available.
Filets de carrelets
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de carrelet MSC or Filets de carrelets?
Overall, Filet de carrelet MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de carrelet MSC has fewer calories: 63 kcal versus 89 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de carrelet MSC has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.