Filet de canard au piment d'espelette vs Filet de canard piment d'espelette
Overall, Filet de canard au piment d'espelette has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Filet de canard au piment d'espelette
Filet de canard piment d'espelette
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de canard au piment d'... | Filet de canard piment d'esp... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 173 kcal | 187 kcal |
| Fat | 11 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.8 g | 3.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 1.6 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de canard au piment d'espelette has 67% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.5 g).
- Filet de canard au piment d'espelette has 43% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.6 g).
- Filet de canard au piment d'espelette has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Filet de canard au piment d'espelette
Not available.
Filet de canard piment d'espelette
90% filet de canard*, conservateurs: lactate de potassium et acétates de sodium, eau, sel, amidon modifié, poivrons déshydratés, tomate déshydratée, dextrose, semoule de riz, plantes aromatiques, arômes naturels, sucre, épices, poudre de jus de betterave, piment d'Espelette 0,04%. *Canard origine France.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de canard au piment d'espelette or Filet de canard piment d'espelette?
Overall, Filet de canard au piment d'espelette has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de canard au piment d'espelette has fewer calories: 173 kcal versus 187 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de canard au piment d'espelette has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.