Comparison
Figues de montagne vs Figues de type lérida
Overall, Figues de type lérida has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Figues de montagne | Figues de type lérida |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 294 kcal | 256 kcal |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 0.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 52 g | 48.7 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 12 g | 12 g |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Figues de type lérida has 13% fewer calories (256 kcal vs 294 kcal).
- Figues de type lérida has 67% less fat (0.9 g vs 2.6 g).
Ingredients
Figues de montagne
Figues séches
Figues de type lérida
figues seches
FAQ
Which is healthier: Figues de montagne or Figues de type lérida?
Overall, Figues de type lérida has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Figues de type lérida has fewer calories: 256 kcal versus 294 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Figues de type lérida has less sugar: 48.7 g versus 52 g per 100 g.