Comparison
Faux filet sous vide V.B.F. vs Faux filet de boeuf Bio
Overall, Faux filet de boeuf Bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Faux filet sous vide V.B.F. | Faux filet de boeuf Bio |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 152 kcal | 148 kcal |
| Fat | 6.7 g | 6.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.7 g | 1.7 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 22 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Faux filet de boeuf Bio has 37% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 2.7 g).
Ingredients
Faux filet sous vide V.B.F.
100% viande de bœuf (origine France).
Faux filet de boeuf Bio
viande de bœuf
FAQ
Which is healthier: Faux filet sous vide V.B.F. or Faux filet de boeuf Bio?
Overall, Faux filet de boeuf Bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Faux filet de boeuf Bio has fewer calories: 148 kcal versus 152 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Faux filet sous vide V.B.F. has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Faux filet Race Limousin... vs Faux filet de boeuf Bio
Faux filet sous vide V.B... vs Faux-filet haché
Faux filet de boeuf Bio vs Faux-filet haché
2 cœurs de faux-filet &... vs Faux filet de boeuf Bio
Faux filet de boeuf Bio vs 1 Faux-filet charolais
Faux-filet Huile d'olive... vs Faux filet de boeuf Bio
Faux filet sous vide V.B... vs Fondant de faux filet
Faux filet de boeuf Bio vs Fondant de faux filet