Comparison
Faux filet Race Limousine vs Faux filet de boeuf Bio
Overall, Faux filet de boeuf Bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Faux filet Race Limousine | Faux filet de boeuf Bio |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 152 kcal | 148 kcal |
| Fat | 6.7 g | 6.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 1.7 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 22 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Faux filet de boeuf Bio has 23% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 2.2 g).
- Faux filet de boeuf Bio has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Faux filet Race Limousine
Not available.
Faux filet de boeuf Bio
viande de bœuf
FAQ
Which is healthier: Faux filet Race Limousine or Faux filet de boeuf Bio?
Overall, Faux filet de boeuf Bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Faux filet de boeuf Bio has fewer calories: 148 kcal versus 152 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Faux filet Race Limousine has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Faux filet Race Limousin... vs 2 cœurs de faux-filet &...
Faux filet Race Limousin... vs 1 Faux-filet charolais
Faux filet Race Limousin... vs Faux-filet Huile d'olive...
Faux filet Race Limousin... vs Faux-filet haché
Faux filet de boeuf Bio vs Faux-filet haché
2 cœurs de faux-filet &... vs Faux filet de boeuf Bio
Faux filet de boeuf Bio vs 1 Faux-filet charolais
Faux-filet Huile d'olive... vs Faux filet de boeuf Bio