Faux-filet Huile d'olive et Romarin vs Faux filet de boeuf Bio
Overall, Faux filet de boeuf Bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Faux-filet Huile d'olive et... | Faux filet de boeuf Bio |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 148 kcal | 148 kcal |
| Fat | 6 g | 6.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.3 g | 1.7 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Faux-filet Huile d'olive et Romarin has 10% less fat (6 g vs 6.7 g).
- Faux filet de boeuf Bio has 26% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 2.3 g).
- Faux filet de boeuf Bio has 70% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Faux filet de boeuf Bio has the better Nutri-Score.
- Faux filet de boeuf Bio is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Faux-filet Huile d'olive et Romarin
Viande bovine 89 %, huile d’olive 3.5 %, eau, arôme naturel, vinaigre tamponné, sel, romarin 0.2 %, ail déshydraté, poivre.
Faux filet de boeuf Bio
viande de bœuf
FAQ
Which is healthier: Faux-filet Huile d'olive et Romarin or Faux filet de boeuf Bio?
Overall, Faux filet de boeuf Bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Faux-filet Huile d'olive et Romarin has fewer calories: 148 kcal versus 148 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Faux-filet Huile d'olive et Romarin has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.