Comparison
Faux filet de boeuf Bio vs Fondant de faux filet
Overall, Faux filet de boeuf Bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Faux filet de boeuf Bio | Fondant de faux filet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 148 kcal | 151 kcal |
| Fat | 6.7 g | 6.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.7 g | 2.7 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 22 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Faux filet de boeuf Bio has 37% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 2.7 g).
- Faux filet de boeuf Bio has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Faux filet de boeuf Bio
viande de bœuf
Fondant de faux filet
Viande bovine
FAQ
Which is healthier: Faux filet de boeuf Bio or Fondant de faux filet?
Overall, Faux filet de boeuf Bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Faux filet de boeuf Bio has fewer calories: 148 kcal versus 151 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Faux filet de boeuf Bio has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Faux filet Race Limousin... vs Faux filet de boeuf Bio
Faux-filet haché vs Fondant de faux filet
Faux filet de boeuf Bio vs Faux-filet haché
2 cœurs de faux-filet &... vs Faux filet de boeuf Bio
Faux filet de boeuf Bio vs 1 Faux-filet charolais
Faux-filet Huile d'olive... vs Faux filet de boeuf Bio
Faux filet sous vide V.B... vs Fondant de faux filet
Faux filet Race Limousin... vs Fondant de faux filet