Comparison
Faux filet sous vide V.B.F. vs Faux-filet haché
Overall, Faux filet sous vide V.B.F. has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Faux filet sous vide V.B.F. | Faux-filet haché |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 152 kcal | 170 kcal |
| Fat | 6.7 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.7 g | 3.9 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 22 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Faux filet sous vide V.B.F. has 11% fewer calories (152 kcal vs 170 kcal).
- Faux filet sous vide V.B.F. has 33% less fat (6.7 g vs 10 g).
- Faux filet sous vide V.B.F. has 31% less saturated fat (2.7 g vs 3.9 g).
Ingredients
Faux filet sous vide V.B.F.
100% viande de bœuf (origine France).
Faux-filet haché
Viande de Bœuf haché
FAQ
Which is healthier: Faux filet sous vide V.B.F. or Faux-filet haché?
Overall, Faux filet sous vide V.B.F. has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Faux filet sous vide V.B.F. has fewer calories: 152 kcal versus 170 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Faux filet sous vide V.B.F. has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Faux-filet haché vs Fondant de faux filet
Faux filet Race Limousin... vs Faux-filet haché
2 cœurs de faux-filet &... vs Faux-filet haché
Faux filet de boeuf Bio vs Faux-filet haché
Faux-filet haché vs 1 Faux-filet charolais
Faux-filet Huile d'olive... vs Faux-filet haché
Faux filet sous vide V.B... vs Fondant de faux filet
Faux filet Race Limousin... vs Faux filet sous vide V.B...