Fat free Classic Ranch vs Fransk Dressing
Overall, Fat free Classic Ranch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fat free Classic Ranch | Fransk Dressing |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 141 kcal | 47 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 9.4 g | 11 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fransk Dressing has 67% fewer calories (47 kcal vs 141 kcal).
- Fat free Classic Ranch has 14% less sugar (9.4 g vs 11 g).
- Fat free Classic Ranch has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Fat free Classic Ranch
Not available.
Fransk Dressing
vann, sukker, eddik, salt, fortykningsmiddel (karragenan, xantangummi), paprika, løk, krydderurter (persille, dill), surhetsregulerende middel (trinatriumsitrat), konserverings - middel (natriumbenzoat), aroma.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fat free Classic Ranch or Fransk Dressing?
Overall, Fat free Classic Ranch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fransk Dressing has fewer calories: 47 kcal versus 141 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fat free Classic Ranch has less sugar: 9.4 g versus 11 g per 100 g.