French dressing vs Fat free Classic Ranch
Overall, French dressing has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | French dressing | Fat free Classic Ranch |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 94 kcal | 141 kcal |
| Fat | 3.3 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 11.2 g | 9.4 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- French dressing has 33% fewer calories (94 kcal vs 141 kcal).
- Fat free Classic Ranch has no fat, while French dressing has 3.3 g.
- Fat free Classic Ranch has 16% less sugar (9.4 g vs 11.2 g).
- French dressing has 34% less salt (1 g vs 1.5 g).
- French dressing has 100% more fiber (0.6 g vs 0 g).
- French dressing has 100% more protein (0.4 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
French dressing
Water, white wine vinegar,sugar, Dijon mustard (water, mustard seeds, vinegar, sea salt), cornflour, cold pressed rapeseed oil, salt, concentrated lemon juice, citrus fibre, rowan extract, chives, flat leaf parsley,cracked black pepper, thyme, turmeric
Fat free Classic Ranch
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: French dressing or Fat free Classic Ranch?
Overall, French dressing has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
French dressing has fewer calories: 94 kcal versus 141 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fat free Classic Ranch has less sugar: 9.4 g versus 11.2 g per 100 g.