Comparison

Farine de seigle type 130 vs Roggenmehl 1150

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Farine de seigle type 130	Roggenmehl 1150
Nutri-Score	a	a
NOVA group	1	1
Calories	333 kcal	334 kcal
Fat	1.3 g	1.3 g
Saturated fat	0.2 g	0.2 g
Sugars	2 g	1.5 g
Salt	0 g	0 g
Fiber	10.6 g	7.7 g
Protein	9.1 g	9 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	Gluten	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Roggenmehl 1150 has 25% less sugar (1.5 g vs 2 g).
Farine de seigle type 130 has 27% more fiber (10.6 g vs 7.7 g).
Only Farine de seigle type 130 lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Farine de seigle type 130

_Seigle_ biologique.

Roggenmehl 1150

100% Roggenmehl, Das Produkt kann Spuren von Lupinen, Senf und Soja enthalten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Farine de seigle type 130 or Roggenmehl 1150?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Farine de seigle type 130 has fewer calories: 333 kcal versus 334 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Roggenmehl 1150 has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Pain nordique vs Farine de seigle type 13... Roggenmehl 1150 vs Roggenvollkornmehl Farine de seigle type 13... vs Roggenvollkornmehl Pain nordique vs Roggenmehl 1150 Roggenmehl 1150 vs Wholemeal Rye Flour imp Farine de seigle type 13... vs Wholemeal Rye Flour imp Farine de seigle type 13... vs Farine semi-complète de... Roggenvollkornmehl vs Roggenmehl 1150