Farine de seigle type 130 vs Roggenvollkornmehl
Overall, Farine de seigle type 130 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Farine de seigle type 130 | Roggenvollkornmehl |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 333 kcal | 315 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 1.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 10.6 g | 25.5 g |
| Protein | 9.1 g | 9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Farine de seigle type 130 has 24% less fat (1.3 g vs 1.7 g).
- Farine de seigle type 130 has 33% less sugar (2 g vs 3 g).
- Roggenvollkornmehl has 58% more fiber (25.5 g vs 10.6 g).
Ingredients
Farine de seigle type 130
_Seigle_ biologique.
Roggenvollkornmehl
_Roggenvollkornmehl_¹. Kann Spuren von _Soja_, _Lupine_ und _Sesam_ enthalten. ¹aus kontrolliert biologischer Landwirtschaft.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Farine de seigle type 130 or Roggenvollkornmehl?
Overall, Farine de seigle type 130 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Roggenvollkornmehl has fewer calories: 315 kcal versus 333 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Farine de seigle type 130 has less sugar: 2 g versus 3 g per 100 g.