Comparison

Fairlife 2% Reduced Fat ultra-filtered milk vs High Protein Soja Drink

Overall, Fairlife 2% Reduced Fat ultra-filtered milk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFairlife 2% Reduced Fat ultr...High Protein Soja Drink
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 52 kcal 57 kcal
Fat 2 g 2.9 g
Saturated fat 1.3 g 0.5 g
Sugars 2.6 g 2.5 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0 g 0.9 g
Protein 5.7 g 5 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Fairlife 2% Reduced Fat ultra-filtered milk has 33% less fat (2 g vs 2.9 g).
  • High Protein Soja Drink has 62% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.3 g).
  • High Protein Soja Drink has 100% more fiber (0.9 g vs 0 g).
  • Fairlife 2% Reduced Fat ultra-filtered milk has 12% more protein (5.7 g vs 5 g).
  • Fairlife 2% Reduced Fat ultra-filtered milk is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only High Protein Soja Drink lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Fairlife 2% Reduced Fat ultra-filtered milk

reduced fat ultra-filtered milk, lactase enzyme, vitamin a palmitate, vitamin d3

High Protein Soja Drink

Sojabasis (96,9%) (Wasser, geschälte Sojabohnen (13,1%)), Zucker, Säureregulatoren (Kaliumphosphate), Calcium (Calciumcarbonat), Aroma, Meersalz, Stabilisator (Gellan), Vitamine B2, B12, D2.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Fairlife 2% Reduced Fat ultra-filtered milk or High Protein Soja Drink?

Overall, Fairlife 2% Reduced Fat ultra-filtered milk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Fairlife 2% Reduced Fat ultra-filtered milk has fewer calories: 52 kcal versus 57 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

High Protein Soja Drink has less sugar: 2.5 g versus 2.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons