Comparison

Ethiquable Pindakaas vs Crema di Mandorle Pelate Bio 100%

Overall, Crema di Mandorle Pelate Bio 100% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientEthiquable PindakaasCrema di Mandorle Pelate Bio...
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 576 kcal 666 kcal
Fat 48 g 57 g
Saturated fat 10 g 4.2 g
Sugars 5.9 g 4.3 g
Salt 0.5 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 7.6 g
Protein 25 g 27 g
Additives10
AllergensPeanutsNuts, Sesame seeds

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Ethiquable Pindakaas has 14% fewer calories (576 kcal vs 666 kcal).
  • Ethiquable Pindakaas has 16% less fat (48 g vs 57 g).
  • Crema di Mandorle Pelate Bio 100% has 58% less saturated fat (4.2 g vs 10 g).
  • Crema di Mandorle Pelate Bio 100% has 27% less sugar (4.3 g vs 5.9 g).
  • Crema di Mandorle Pelate Bio 100% has no salt, while Ethiquable Pindakaas has 0.5 g.
  • Crema di Mandorle Pelate Bio 100% has 100% more fiber (7.6 g vs 0 g).
  • Crema di Mandorle Pelate Bio 100% is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Ethiquable Pindakaas lists: Peanuts.
  • Only Crema di Mandorle Pelate Bio 100% lists: Nuts, Sesame seeds.

Ingredients

Ethiquable Pindakaas

Arachide 95%, huile de tournesol, stéarine de palme, sel.

Crema di Mandorle Pelate Bio 100%

MANDORLE (biologico). Può contenere ARACHIDI, altra FRUTTA A GUSCIO, SESAMO. SENZA GLUTINE.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Ethiquable Pindakaas or Crema di Mandorle Pelate Bio 100%?

Overall, Crema di Mandorle Pelate Bio 100% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ethiquable Pindakaas has fewer calories: 576 kcal versus 666 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Crema di Mandorle Pelate Bio 100% has less sugar: 4.3 g versus 5.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons