Espirales con vegetales vs Espirales vegetales
Overall, Espirales con vegetales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Espirales con vegetales | Espirales vegetales |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 354 kcal | 344 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 4 g | — |
| Protein | 11 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Espirales con vegetales has 25% less fat (1.5 g vs 2 g).
- Espirales con vegetales has 25% less sugar (3 g vs 4 g).
- Espirales con vegetales has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Espirales vegetales lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Espirales con vegetales
sémota de trigo duro, tomate deshidratado 3%, espinacas deshidratadas 2%.
Espirales vegetales
Pasta alimenticia de calidad superior (sémola de _trigo_ duro), pasta alimenticia roja (sémola de _trigo_ duro, tomate concentrado 5%), pasta alimenticia verde (sémola de _trigo_ duro, espinacas deshidratadas 2.5%
FAQ
Which is healthier: Espirales con vegetales or Espirales vegetales?
Overall, Espirales con vegetales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Espirales vegetales has fewer calories: 344 kcal versus 354 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Espirales con vegetales has less sugar: 3 g versus 4 g per 100 g.