Espirales con vegetales vs Espirales con vegetales
Overall, Espirales con vegetales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Espirales con vegetales | Espirales con vegetales |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 354 kcal | 344 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 3.6 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 4 g | — |
| Protein | 12 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Espirales con vegetales has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Espirales con vegetales lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Espirales con vegetales
Sémola de _trigo_ duro, tomate deshidratado 4%, espinacas deshidratadas 2%.
Espirales con vegetales
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Espirales con vegetales or Espirales con vegetales?
Overall, Espirales con vegetales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Espirales con vegetales has fewer calories: 344 kcal versus 354 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Espirales con vegetales has less sugar: 3.6 g versus 4 g per 100 g.