Comparison

Erbseneintopf vs Kichererbseneintopf mit Kokosmilch

Overall, Erbseneintopf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientErbseneintopfKichererbseneintopf mit Koko...
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 88 kcal 91 kcal
Fat 1.8 g 3.1 g
Saturated fat 0.6 g 2.4 g
Sugars 0.8 g 2.5 g
Salt 0.7 g 1.2 g
Fiber 3.2 g 2.6 g
Protein 5.7 g 3 g
Additives31
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Erbseneintopf has 42% less fat (1.8 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Erbseneintopf has 75% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Erbseneintopf has 68% less sugar (0.8 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Erbseneintopf has 38% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Erbseneintopf has 19% more fiber (3.2 g vs 2.6 g).
  • Erbseneintopf has 47% more protein (5.7 g vs 3 g).
  • Erbseneintopf has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Kichererbseneintopf mit Kokosmilch is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Erbseneintopf

Wasser, 40% Erbsen, 4,1% Kasseler Würfel aus Schulter und Schinken (Schweinefleisch, Wasser, Salz, getrockneter Glukosesirup, Stabilisator: Diphosphate, Aroma, Dextrose, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat, Rapsöl, Rauch), Möhren, Kartoffeln, Speck (Schweinebacke, Salz, Rauch), Salz, Aromen, Hefeextrakt, Kochsalzersatz (Kaliumchlorid), Zucker, Zwiebelpulver, Spinatpulver, Knoblauchpulver, Petersilie, Dextrose, Raucharoma. Verdickungsmittel: Guarkernmehl

Kichererbseneintopf mit Kokosmilch

Wasser, 22% Kichererbsen*, 12% Kokosmilch* (Kokosnussextrakt*, Wasser), 8% Karottenstücke* (Karotte*, Antioxidationsmittel: Citronensäure), Tomatenmark*, 5% Mangomark*, 4% Zwiebeln*, 4% Süßkartoffeln*, Reismehl*, Paprika* gelb, Mais*, Meersalz, Knoblauch*, Kumin*, Ingwer*, Kurkuma*, Kardamom*, Petersilie*, Pfeffer* schwarz, Chili*, Koriander*. *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft

FAQ

Which is healthier: Erbseneintopf or Kichererbseneintopf mit Kokosmilch?

Overall, Erbseneintopf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Erbseneintopf has fewer calories: 88 kcal versus 91 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Erbseneintopf has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons