Energy Balls vs Energy Balls Mix
Overall, Energy Balls has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Energy Balls | Energy Balls Mix |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 309 kcal | 480 kcal |
| Fat | 2.8 g | 27 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 10 g |
| Sugars | 59 g | 8.4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | — |
| Fiber | 8.9 g | 9.7 g |
| Protein | 3.1 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Energy Balls has 36% fewer calories (309 kcal vs 480 kcal).
- Energy Balls has 90% less fat (2.8 g vs 27 g).
- Energy Balls has 94% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 10 g).
- Energy Balls Mix has 86% less sugar (8.4 g vs 59 g).
- Energy Balls Mix has 79% more protein (15 g vs 3.1 g).
Ingredients
Energy Balls
Datteln (85%), getrocknete Cranberries (5%) (Cranberries, Apfelsaft, Sonnenblumenöl), Cashewkerne (5%), gefriergetrocknetes Cranberry-Pulver (2%), Reismehl (2%), gefriergetrocknetes Acai-Pulver (1%). Kann Spuren von anderen Schalenfrüchten (Nüssen), Fragmente von Dattelkernen und Nussschalen enthalten. Kuličky z datlí, kešu ořechů, brusinek a acai Složení: datle (85%), brusinky (5%) (brusinky, jablečná šťáva, slunečnicový olej), kešu ořechy (5%), sušené brusinky (2%), rýžová mouka (2%), sušený acai prášek (1%).Může obsahovat stopy jiných ořechů, kousky datlí a skořápek.
Energy Balls Mix
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Energy Balls or Energy Balls Mix?
Overall, Energy Balls has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Energy Balls has fewer calories: 309 kcal versus 480 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Energy Balls Mix has less sugar: 8.4 g versus 59 g per 100 g.