Comparison

Energise Super smoothie vs Smoothie ananas, banane & coco

Overall, Energise Super smoothie has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientEnergise Super smoothieSmoothie ananas, banane & co...
Nutri-Score — e
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 53 kcal 66 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.7 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.6 g
Sugars 10 g 12 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 1.4 g 1.1 g
Protein 1.5 g 0.8 g
Additives00
AllergensApple, BananaNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Energise Super smoothie has 20% fewer calories (53 kcal vs 66 kcal).
  • Energise Super smoothie has no fat, while Smoothie ananas, banane & coco has 0.7 g.
  • Energise Super smoothie has 92% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Energise Super smoothie has 17% less sugar (10 g vs 12 g).
  • Energise Super smoothie has 47% more protein (1.5 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Only Energise Super smoothie lists: Apple, Banana.

Ingredients

Energise Super smoothie

apple (50%), red grapes, white grapes, banana, strawberries (10%), blackcurrants, cherries (3.3%), beetroot juice, milled flax seeds (0.56%), guarana (0.01%), vitamin B1, vitamin B2, vitamin B3, vitamin B6, vitamin C vitamin E.

Smoothie ananas, banane & coco

3/4 d'un ananas pressé (39 %), 3 1/2 bananes écrasées (37 %), 1 pomme pressée, 1/3 d'orange pressée, du lait de coco onctueux (3,3 %) et un peu de jus de citron.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Energise Super smoothie or Smoothie ananas, banane & coco?

Overall, Energise Super smoothie has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Energise Super smoothie has fewer calories: 53 kcal versus 66 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Energise Super smoothie has less sugar: 10 g versus 12 g per 100 g.

More comparisons