Comparison

Super smoothie energy vs Smoothie ananas, banane & coco

Overall, Super smoothie energy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientSuper smoothie energySmoothie ananas, banane & co...
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 53 kcal 66 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.7 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.6 g
Sugars 10 g 12 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 1.4 g 1.1 g
Protein 1.5 g 0.8 g
Additives00
AllergensNoneNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Super smoothie energy has 20% fewer calories (53 kcal vs 66 kcal).
  • Super smoothie energy has no fat, while Smoothie ananas, banane & coco has 0.7 g.
  • Super smoothie energy has no saturated fat, while Smoothie ananas, banane & coco has 0.6 g.
  • Super smoothie energy has 17% less sugar (10 g vs 12 g).
  • Super smoothie energy has 47% more protein (1.5 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Super smoothie energy has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Super smoothie energy lists: None.

Ingredients

Super smoothie energy

pomme (50%), raisin, bananes, fraise (10%), griotte (3,3%), cassis (3%), betterave, extrait de racine de chicorée, graines de lin (0,11%), infusion de guarana (0,01%), vitamines (B1, B2, B6, C, E, niacine).

Smoothie ananas, banane & coco

3/4 d'un ananas pressé (39 %), 3 1/2 bananes écrasées (37 %), 1 pomme pressée, 1/3 d'orange pressée, du lait de coco onctueux (3,3 %) et un peu de jus de citron.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Super smoothie energy or Smoothie ananas, banane & coco?

Overall, Super smoothie energy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Super smoothie energy has fewer calories: 53 kcal versus 66 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Super smoothie energy has less sugar: 10 g versus 12 g per 100 g.

More comparisons