Comparison

Energel: Quick Boost Forest Fruit vs 100% Creatine Monohydrate

Overall, 100% Creatine Monohydrate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientEnergel: Quick Boost Forest...100% Creatine Monohydrate
Nutri-Score d —
NOVA group — —
Calories 255 kcal 0 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 45 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 0 g 0 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • 100% Creatine Monohydrate has no calories, while Energel: Quick Boost Forest Fruit has 255 kcal.
  • 100% Creatine Monohydrate has no sugar, while Energel: Quick Boost Forest Fruit has 45 g.

Ingredients

Energel: Quick Boost Forest Fruit

Not available.

100% Creatine Monohydrate

Monohidrato de Creatina

FAQ

Which is healthier: Energel: Quick Boost Forest Fruit or 100% Creatine Monohydrate?

Overall, 100% Creatine Monohydrate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

100% Creatine Monohydrate has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 255 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

100% Creatine Monohydrate has less sugar: 0 g versus 45 g per 100 g.

More comparisons