Comparison

Energel: Quick Boost Forest Fruit vs Nimbus

Overall, Nimbus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientEnergel: Quick Boost Forest...Nimbus
Nutri-Score d —
NOVA group — 4
Calories 255 kcal 316 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.1 g
Saturated fat 0 g —
Sugars 45 g 21.3 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber — 30.8 g
Protein 0 g 1.2 g
Additives06
AllergensNone listedSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Energel: Quick Boost Forest Fruit has 19% fewer calories (255 kcal vs 316 kcal).
  • Nimbus has 53% less sugar (21.3 g vs 45 g).
  • Nimbus has 100% more protein (1.2 g vs 0 g).
  • Only Nimbus lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Energel: Quick Boost Forest Fruit

Not available.

Nimbus

INDICACIONES: Este producto contiene colorante roio No. 6 que puede producir reacciones alérgicas, no se recomienda a personas sensibles a los componentes de la fórmula. INGREDIENTES: Maltodextrina, Fructooligosacáridos, Insulina de agave, Fructosa, Fibra de soya, Fibra de avena, Fibra de manzana, Acido citrico, Pulpa de ciruela pasa deshidratada en polvo, Carboximetilcelulosa, Sabor guayaba, Sucralosa, Extracto seco de la Hoja de Psidium vulgare, Benzoato de sodio, Dioxido de silicio, Stevia, Color rojo No. 6 CI: 16255 (E 124). Amocenar en un lugar limpio, fresco y seco. Manténgase fuera del alcance de los niños.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Energel: Quick Boost Forest Fruit or Nimbus?

Overall, Nimbus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Energel: Quick Boost Forest Fruit has fewer calories: 255 kcal versus 316 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Nimbus has less sugar: 21.3 g versus 45 g per 100 g.

More comparisons