Comparison

24Burn vs Energel: Quick Boost Forest Fruit

Overall, 24Burn has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient24BurnEnergel: Quick Boost Forest...
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 95 kcal 255 kcal
Fat 0.1 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0 g
Sugars 0 g 45 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 21.8 g —
Protein 0.3 g 0 g
Additives30
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • 24Burn has 63% fewer calories (95 kcal vs 255 kcal).
  • 24Burn has no sugar, while Energel: Quick Boost Forest Fruit has 45 g.
  • 24Burn has 100% more protein (0.3 g vs 0 g).
  • 24Burn has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

24Burn

Malic Acid, Natural Flavors, Citric Acid, Stevia, Silicon Dioxide, Steviol Glycosides

Energel: Quick Boost Forest Fruit

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: 24Burn or Energel: Quick Boost Forest Fruit?

Overall, 24Burn has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

24Burn has fewer calories: 95 kcal versus 255 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

24Burn has less sugar: 0 g versus 45 g per 100 g.

More comparisons