24Burn vs Super Mass Gainer Rich Chocolate
Overall, 24Burn has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 24Burn | Super Mass Gainer Rich Choco... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 95 kcal | 384 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 3.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 6.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 21.8 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 15.5 g |
| Additives | 3 | 10 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 24Burn has 75% fewer calories (95 kcal vs 384 kcal).
- 24Burn has 97% less fat (0.1 g vs 3.3 g).
- 24Burn has 89% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.9 g).
- 24Burn has no sugar, while Super Mass Gainer Rich Chocolate has 6.3 g.
- 24Burn has 98% less salt (0 g vs 0.4 g).
- 24Burn has 96% more fiber (21.8 g vs 0.9 g).
- Super Mass Gainer Rich Chocolate has 98% more protein (15.5 g vs 0.3 g).
- Only Super Mass Gainer Rich Chocolate lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
24Burn
Malic Acid, Natural Flavors, Citric Acid, Stevia, Silicon Dioxide, Steviol Glycosides
Super Mass Gainer Rich Chocolate
MALTODEXTRIN, PROTEIN BLEND (WHEY PROTEIN CONCENTRATE, MILK PROTEIN ISOLATE, WHEY PROTEIN ISOLATE, WHEY PROTEIN HYDROLYSATE, MICELLAR CASEIN), SUNFLOWER CREAMER (SUNFLOWER OIL, MALTODEXTRIN, SODIUM CASEINATE, MONO & DIGLYCERIDES, NATURAL TOCOPHEROLS AND TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE), COCOA POWDER (PROCESSED WITH ALKALI), LESS THAN 2% OF: CREATINE MONOHYDRATE, FRUCTOSE, NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL FLAVORS, VITAMIN & MINERAL BLEND (SODIUM ASCORBATE, D-ALPHA TOCOPHERYL ACETATE, CALCIUM-D-PANTOTHENATE, POTASSIUM IODIDE, PYRIDOXINE HYDROCHLORIDE, THIAMINE HYDROCHLORIDE, RIBOFLAVIN, CYANOCOBALAMIN), GUM BLEND (CELLULOSE GUM, XANTHAN GUM, CARRAGEENAN), POTASSIUM CHLORIDE, SALT, SOY LECITHIN, ACESULFAME POTASSIUM, SUCRALOSE, SUNFLOWER LECITHIN
FAQ
Which is healthier: 24Burn or Super Mass Gainer Rich Chocolate?
Overall, 24Burn has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
24Burn has fewer calories: 95 kcal versus 384 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
24Burn has less sugar: 0 g versus 6.3 g per 100 g.