Comparison
Elicoidali 22 vs Penne Rigate
Overall, Penne Rigate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Elicoidali 22 | Penne Rigate |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 355 kcal | 358 kcal |
| Fat | 1.7 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 3.9 g | 3 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 13 g | 12.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Penne Rigate has 67% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.9 g).
- Penne Rigate has 23% less sugar (3 g vs 3.9 g).
Ingredients
Elicoidali 22
Not available.
Penne Rigate
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Elicoidali 22 or Penne Rigate?
Overall, Penne Rigate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Elicoidali 22 has fewer calories: 355 kcal versus 358 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Penne Rigate has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.