Comparison
Elicoidali 22 vs Caserecce 50
Overall, Caserecce 50 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Elicoidali 22 | Caserecce 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 355 kcal | 359 kcal |
| Fat | 1.7 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 3.9 g | 2.4 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.6 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Caserecce 50 has 67% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.9 g).
- Caserecce 50 has 38% less sugar (2.4 g vs 3.9 g).
- Caserecce 50 has 100% more fiber (2.6 g vs 0 g).
- Only Caserecce 50 lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Elicoidali 22
Not available.
Caserecce 50
semola di grano duro, acqua. Può contenere tracce di soia e senape
FAQ
Which is healthier: Elicoidali 22 or Caserecce 50?
Overall, Caserecce 50 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Elicoidali 22 has fewer calories: 355 kcal versus 359 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Caserecce 50 has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.