Comparison
Caserecce 50 vs Pasta di semola grano duro
Overall, Caserecce 50 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Caserecce 50 | Pasta di semola grano duro |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 359 kcal | 364 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 2.4 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 2.6 g | — |
| Protein | 12 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Caserecce 50 has 20% less sugar (2.4 g vs 3 g).
- Only Caserecce 50 lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Caserecce 50
semola di grano duro, acqua. Può contenere tracce di soia e senape
Pasta di semola grano duro
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Caserecce 50 or Pasta di semola grano duro?
Overall, Caserecce 50 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Caserecce 50 has fewer calories: 359 kcal versus 364 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Caserecce 50 has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 3 g per 100 g.