Ekstra džem od smokve vs Confettura Extra Albicocche
Overall, Ekstra džem od smokve has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Ekstra džem od smokve
Confettura Extra Albicocche
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ekstra džem od smokve | Confettura Extra Albicocche |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 275 kcal | 171 kcal |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 65 g | 40.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.4 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 1.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Confettura Extra Albicocche has 38% fewer calories (171 kcal vs 275 kcal).
- Confettura Extra Albicocche has 38% less sugar (40.5 g vs 65 g).
- Ekstra džem od smokve has 47% more fiber (3.4 g vs 1.8 g).
- Ekstra džem od smokve has 69% more protein (1.3 g vs 0.4 g).
- Ekstra džem od smokve is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Ekstra džem od smokve
Smokva, šećer, regulator kiselosti: limunska kiselina; tvar za zela. Proizvedeno od 80g voća na 100g proizvoda. ukupni šećeri 65g.
Confettura Extra Albicocche
50% albicocche, zucchero, acqua, 100 g gelificante: pectine; acidificante: acido citrico. 171 kcal Nonostante una lavorazione accurata non è possibile 0,1g escludere completamente la presenza di noccioli o <0,1g frammenti di noccioli.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ekstra džem od smokve or Confettura Extra Albicocche?
Overall, Ekstra džem od smokve has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Confettura Extra Albicocche has fewer calories: 171 kcal versus 275 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Confettura Extra Albicocche has less sugar: 40.5 g versus 65 g per 100 g.