Ekologisk Karljohan Svamp vs Steinpilze
Overall, Ekologisk Karljohan Svamp has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ekologisk Karljohan Svamp | Steinpilze |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 203 kcal | 306 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 17 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 19 g |
| Protein | 27 g | 31 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ekologisk Karljohan Svamp has 34% fewer calories (203 kcal vs 306 kcal).
- Ekologisk Karljohan Svamp has 30% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 1 g).
- Ekologisk Karljohan Svamp has 91% less sugar (1.5 g vs 17 g).
- Steinpilze has 91% more fiber (19 g vs 1.7 g).
- Steinpilze has 13% more protein (31 g vs 27 g).
Ingredients
Ekologisk Karljohan Svamp
Boletus edulis
Steinpilze
bolets.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ekologisk Karljohan Svamp or Steinpilze?
Overall, Ekologisk Karljohan Svamp has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ekologisk Karljohan Svamp has fewer calories: 203 kcal versus 306 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ekologisk Karljohan Svamp has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 17 g per 100 g.