Comparison

Ekologisk Karljohan Svamp vs Hongo seco boletus edulis

Overall, Hongo seco boletus edulis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientEkologisk Karljohan SvampHongo seco boletus edulis
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 203 kcal 31 kcal
Fat 3 g 0.3 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 0.1 g
Sugars 1.5 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 1.7 g 1.7 g
Protein 27 g 1.8 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Hongo seco boletus edulis has 85% fewer calories (31 kcal vs 203 kcal).
  • Hongo seco boletus edulis has 90% less fat (0.3 g vs 3 g).
  • Hongo seco boletus edulis has 90% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Hongo seco boletus edulis has no sugar, while Ekologisk Karljohan Svamp has 1.5 g.
  • Ekologisk Karljohan Svamp has 93% more protein (27 g vs 1.8 g).

Ingredients

Ekologisk Karljohan Svamp

Boletus edulis

Hongo seco boletus edulis

Boletus edulis

FAQ

Which is healthier: Ekologisk Karljohan Svamp or Hongo seco boletus edulis?

Overall, Hongo seco boletus edulis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Hongo seco boletus edulis has fewer calories: 31 kcal versus 203 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Hongo seco boletus edulis has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons