Ekologisk Karljohan Svamp vs Hongo seco boletus edulis
Overall, Hongo seco boletus edulis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Ekologisk Karljohan Svamp
Hongo seco boletus edulis
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ekologisk Karljohan Svamp | Hongo seco boletus edulis |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 203 kcal | 31 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 27 g | 1.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hongo seco boletus edulis has 85% fewer calories (31 kcal vs 203 kcal).
- Hongo seco boletus edulis has 90% less fat (0.3 g vs 3 g).
- Hongo seco boletus edulis has 90% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Hongo seco boletus edulis has no sugar, while Ekologisk Karljohan Svamp has 1.5 g.
- Ekologisk Karljohan Svamp has 93% more protein (27 g vs 1.8 g).
Ingredients
Ekologisk Karljohan Svamp
Boletus edulis
Hongo seco boletus edulis
Boletus edulis
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ekologisk Karljohan Svamp or Hongo seco boletus edulis?
Overall, Hongo seco boletus edulis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hongo seco boletus edulis has fewer calories: 31 kcal versus 203 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hongo seco boletus edulis has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.