Edel-Nusskern Mischung vs Castañas en almíbar ligero
Overall, Castañas en almíbar ligero has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Edel-Nusskern Mischung
Castañas en almíbar ligero
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Edel-Nusskern Mischung | Castañas en almíbar ligero |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 634 kcal | 206 kcal |
| Fat | 56 g | 1.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 7 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 6 g | 21 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 1.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts, Macadamianusskerne | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Castañas en almíbar ligero has 68% fewer calories (206 kcal vs 634 kcal).
- Castañas en almíbar ligero has 98% less fat (1.1 g vs 56 g).
- Castañas en almíbar ligero has 97% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 7 g).
- Edel-Nusskern Mischung has 71% less sugar (6 g vs 21 g).
- Edel-Nusskern Mischung has 89% more protein (15 g vs 1.6 g).
- Castañas en almíbar ligero has the better Nutri-Score.
- Edel-Nusskern Mischung is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Edel-Nusskern Mischung lists: Macadamianusskerne.
Ingredients
Edel-Nusskern Mischung
blanchierte _Mandelkerne_, naturelle _Haselnusskerne_, _Cashewkerne_, _Paranusskerne_, _Macadamianusskerne_
Castañas en almíbar ligero
Castañas, azúcar, agua, jarabe de glucosa y aroma natural de vainilla. Almíbar superior a 22° brix.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Edel-Nusskern Mischung or Castañas en almíbar ligero?
Overall, Castañas en almíbar ligero has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Castañas en almíbar ligero has fewer calories: 206 kcal versus 634 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Edel-Nusskern Mischung has less sugar: 6 g versus 21 g per 100 g.