Comparison

EDEKA Laru Zwiebelschmalz 150g 1.89€ 1kg 12.60€ vs Pipas Peladas

Overall, Pipas Peladas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientEDEKA Laru Zwiebelschmalz 15...Pipas Peladas
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 872 kcal 659 kcal
Fat 96 g 59 g
Saturated fat 45 g 8.1 g
Sugars 0.6 g 2.6 g
Salt 1.2 g 0.8 g
Fiber — 7.8 g
Protein 0.5 g 26 g
Additives10
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pipas Peladas has 24% fewer calories (659 kcal vs 872 kcal).
  • Pipas Peladas has 39% less fat (59 g vs 96 g).
  • Pipas Peladas has 82% less saturated fat (8.1 g vs 45 g).
  • EDEKA Laru Zwiebelschmalz 150g 1.89€ 1kg 12.60€ has 77% less sugar (0.6 g vs 2.6 g).
  • Pipas Peladas has 31% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Pipas Peladas has 98% more protein (26 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Pipas Peladas has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only EDEKA Laru Zwiebelschmalz 150g 1.89€ 1kg 12.60€ lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

EDEKA Laru Zwiebelschmalz 150g 1.89€ 1kg 12.60€

Schweineschmalz 92%, Röstzwiebeln 6% (Zwiebeln, Palmöl, Weizenmehl, Speisesalz), Speisesalz, Gewürze, Dextrose, Antioxidationsmittel: Extrakt aus Rosmarin.

Pipas Peladas

GRRINES DE TOURNESOL .!ngrédients; Graines de tournesol décortiquées, graisse végétate de palme, sel huile de tournesol, Peut contenir des traces d'arachides et de fruits à coque,

FAQ

Which is healthier: EDEKA Laru Zwiebelschmalz 150g 1.89€ 1kg 12.60€ or Pipas Peladas?

Overall, Pipas Peladas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pipas Peladas has fewer calories: 659 kcal versus 872 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

EDEKA Laru Zwiebelschmalz 150g 1.89€ 1kg 12.60€ has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 2.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons